From Toolbox to way of thinking
Before Lean became a set of tools on whiteboards, an audit form in Excel, or a checklist in a process improvement project, it was, above all, a way of seeing. Not seeing efficiency in spreadsheets, but seeing value, waste, and collaboration in the real world. On the factory floor. Between people.
In the previous article, we explored how Lean emerged. How the post-war circumstances in Japan led Toyota to develop something far more powerful than a methodology. Today, in article 2 of this 8-part series, we zoom in on what Lean really means.
Because although Lean is now everywhere from logistics to finance, and from healthcare to government, it often gets stuck at the surface: 5S, stand-ups, post-its.
Lean without thinking is like cooking without tasting.
More than 5S and Post-its
Lean is about creating maximum value with minimum waste. But to do that well, you first need to understand what value actually is. Not for you as an organization, but for your customer.
In Lean, we distinguish three types of work:
- Value-adding work: actions the customer wants and is willing to pay for.
- Necessary waste: work that doesnโt add value, but is required (think quality checks or compliance tasks).
- Pure waste: work done simply โbecause weโve always done it that way,โ but which adds no value.
It comes down to this: Are we doing what truly matters? And: are we doing it together, improving a bit every day?
The five principles of Lean thinking
In the 1990s, James Womack and Daniel Jones described five core principles of Lean not as a step-by-step plan, but as a thinking framework to guide continuous improvement:
- Define what value is for the customer.
A manufacturer of industrial pumps had been optimizing its machining department for yearsโfaster machines, shorter cycle times, higher output. Until a customer remarked: โWeโre not buying precision-machined parts. Weโre buying reliable delivery.โ - Map the value stream.
In one factory, they discovered that 90% of total lead time was just waiting. No added valueโjust added cost. - Create flow.
One supplier moved from batch scheduling to one-piece flow. The result: lower inventory and faster throughput. - Let customer demand drive the process.
A wholesaler started replenishing shelves based on what customers actually boughtโinstead of what โinventory management thought made sense.โ - Pursue perfection.
Donโt wait for big breakthroughsโfocus on small improvements every day. Like in Formula 1, where tenths of a second matter, every improvement idea is taken seriously.
What makes these principles so powerful is that they reinforce each other. They donโt just change how you work, they change how you think. Not top-down, but together. Not once, but every day.
Lean as culture, not as project
Lean isnโt a campaign or a change initiative with an end date. Itโs not a certificate on the wall. Lean is a culture. One where speaking up is normal. Where mistakes are seen as learning opportunities. Where people feelโand are givenโownership (responsibility equals mandate). Where people on the shop floor are empowered to solve problems, because they deeply understand the work.
In a Lean organization, youโll notice different behavior:
- People ask questions instead of following assumptions.
- Problems are made visible, not hidden.
- Improvement ideas come from the floor, not from management.
- Leaders are present, ask questions, and truly listen.
Processes are visible. Collaboration is open. And leaders? Theyโre not the boss but in fact the enabler. They go where the work happens, listen, and steer not by spreadsheet, but with behavior. And they donโt do this because they have to, but because it works.
Why Lean Initiatives Fail
And yetโฆ despite all the good intentions, Lean often fails in organizations. Not because people donโt want it, but because Lean gets reduced to a trick. A temporary project. An Excel dashboard filled with KPIs and color-coded zones.
The biggest pitfall? The culture doesnโt change.
When things get tough, organizations fall back into old habits: control instead of trust. Quick fixes instead of root cause analysis. And above all: treating improvement as an โextra taskโ instead of an integral part of the work.
A classic real-world example:
Non-Lean Environment โ Finger-pointing and blame-shifting
Supervisor: โWhy are these semi-finished products sitting idle again?โ
Operator: โWell, assembly was late again. Not my problem.โ
Supervisor: โThen they need to plan better. This is the third time.โ
Operator: โAs long as I hit my output, you wonโt hear me complain.โ
The discussion revolves around someone elseโs mistake. No one asks whether the waiting time adds any value for the customer.
Lean Environment โ Focus on value
Team Lead: โI see the flow between machining and assembly is stalling. What do you notice?โ
Operator: โWe only check the products after machining. If we do it right at the machine, we can keep things moving.โ
Team Lead: โGreat idea. What do you need to test it?โ
Operator: โLet me adjust the checklist. Then weโll start tomorrow.โ
Same situation. Completely different conversation.
Leadership: The Real Difference
What makes the difference between these two worlds? Leadership.
Not the kind of leadership that tries to fix everything and chases every fire. But leaders who are willing to slow down to speed up. Who show up at the workplace, listen without judgment, and ask questions like: โWhat do you need to do this better?โ instead of โWhy did this go wrong?โ
Spoiler alert! Itโs not easy.
Many leaders walk a tightrope between short-term urgency and long-term strategy. Between fixing todayโs escalation and building tomorrowโs ownership.
As one CEO put it before making a tough call:
โI know I can fix this in a dayโthe way weโve always done it. But that wonโt change anything. Or I can let it take a little longer this week and let my people learn to fix it themselves. Itโs a choice: do I want to be right today, or effective tomorrow?โ
Thatโs the leadership tension Lean demands. The courage not to jump in. The trust to step back. And the vision to look beyond the dashboard. Lean leadership isnโt heroic. Itโs human. And above all: itโs servant-minded.
What We Really Mean by Lean
Lean isnโt about tools or three-day training sessions. Itโs about a fundamental way of seeing. Seeing value. Seeing people. Seeing collaboration. It takes courage. It takes behavior. And it takes leaders who walk the talk.
The tools? Theyโre helpful. But without the thinking behind them, theyโre useless.
Lean isnโt a project. Itโs a habit.
Next week weโll dive into article 3: the models and tools of Lean. Which ones actually help? Which ones are distracting? And more importantly: how do you use them to support thinkingโrather than replace it?
See you then.